2021 Cyber Stability Conference: Towards a More Secure Cyberspace

9:15 am
 – 6:00 pm

The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) welcomes you to the 2021 Cyber Stability Conference: Towards a More Secure Cyberspace.

Over the past two decades, Member States’ discussions have focused on the use of information and communications technologies (ICT) and their impact on international security. A breakthrough happened in 2021 with the successful conclusion of two multilateral cyber processes and the beginning of a new Open-Ended Working Group, the first ever with a 5-year mandate.

At UNIDIR’s annual flagship conference on cyber stability, we will convene representatives from government, industry and civil society, reflecting on the past and paving the way for the future. How can we build on past successes to advance the agenda for an open, secure, stable, accessible and peaceful ICT environment? What has been discussed and agreed so far? And what should be prioritised next?
UNIDIR encourages the participation of representatives and experts interested in issues pertaining to the international peace and cyber stability.
Register to join us in person or online, or see below for further details on the programme and participants.
RSVP In-person: https://indico.un.org/e/CS21 (The event “Overview” on Indico provides registration instructions.)


9:15-9:45: Welcome and conference opening remarks by

  • Robin Geiss, Director, UNIDIR

9:50-10:55: Panel 1 – Existing and potential threats
During the 2019-2020 OEWG, States expressed their growing concerns about recent developments in ICT (including for military purposes), which could be used to undermine international peace and security. After a short summary of the main issues discussed at the previous OEWG in relation to existing and potential threats, the panel will focus on the following issues:
Guiding questions:
– Should the threats already identified be further defined? If yes, how? If not, why not?
– Are there important threats that have been missed?
– The rapid technological development and convergence dynamics may unlock new behaviours, methods and threats (e.g. AI-enabled cyber capabilities). How important will it be for a 5-year process to monitor and account for the rapid evolution of the technological landscape?
– To what extent should the OEWG also cover evolving threats from non-state actors?

  • Anastasiya Kazakova, Senior Manager for Public Affairs, Kaspersky
  • Serge Droz, Security Lead, Proton Technologies, and Chair, Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST)
  • Klára Jordan, Chief Public Policy Officer, Cyber Peace Institute
  • Moderator: Giacomo Persi Paoli, Programme Lead, UNIDIR

10:55-11:15: Coffee break
11:15-12:30: Panel 2 – Rules, norms and principles for responsible state behaviour
By increasing predictability and reducing the risk of misunderstandings, voluntary and non-binding norms of responsible State behaviour can reduce risks to international peace, security and stability. The upcoming OEWG has been mandated “to continue, as a priority, to further develop the rules, norms and principles of responsible behaviour of States and the ways for their implementation and, if necessary, to introduce changes to them or elaborate additional rules of behaviour”. Following a concise summary of the discussion so far, this panel will look turn to key issues such as:
Guiding questions:
-Which norms are in need of further development? And how would this development relate to the additional guidance compiled by the Group of Governmental Experts in its 2021 report?
– Are there gaps in the current normative framework that the OEWG should address by elaborating additional (new) rules of behaviour?
– What are the risks and benefits involved in introducing changes to the existing norms? Is the evolutionary approach implied by changing these norms a necessity? Or will it come into conflict the norms that States have already agreed should underpin the OEWG’s work?
– How can industry and other non-state actors support the OEWG in the norm development process?

  • Johanna Weaver, Tech Policy Design Centre, Australian National University
  • Eric Wenger, Senior Director for Government Affairs, Cisco
  • Amb. Nathalie Jaarsma, Ambassador-at-Large for Security Policy and Cyber, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of The Netherlands
  • Moderator: Andraz Kastelic, Lead Cyber Stability Researcher, UNIDIR

12:30-13:30: Lunch
13:30-14:40: Panel 3 – International law
International law – and in particular the Charter of the United Nations – is applicable and essential not only to maintaining peace and stability but also to promoting an open, secure, stable, accessible and peaceful ICT environment. The OEWG 2021-2025 will continue to discuss how international law applies in this context, whether there are any gaps in the existing legal framework, and how they should be addressed. After a short summary of the previous discussion on international law, the panel will focus on the following issues:
Guiding questions:
– How can we leverage the OEWG mandate to answer outstanding questions related to how international law applies?
– How should the OEWG go about identifying gaps in the international law applicable to the ICT environment?
– Is there a role for non-State actors in this endeavour?
– Is there a role for the International Law Commission?

  • Kerli Veski, Director General of the Legal Department at the Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  • Asset Nussupov, Head of a Sector, The Executive Office of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Vera Rusinova, Head & Professor, Faculty of Law / School of International Law, HSE University, Moscow
  • Moderator: Cécile Aptel, Deputy Director, UNIDIR

14:40-14:50: Technical break
14:50-15:55: Panel 4 – Confidence-building Measures
In the 2019-2020 OEWG Final Report, States recognised that confidence-building measures (CBMs) can contribute to preventing conflicts, avoiding misunderstandings and reducing tensions. CBMs include measures relating to transparency as well as cooperation and stability. States acknowledged that practical CBMs had been recommended in previous GGE reports, underlining at the same time that CBMs remain voluntary and that regional and sub-regional organisations are vital to their development. Following a brief summary of past discussions on CBMs, the panel will focus on key issues:
Guiding questions:
– How can the OEWG support States that are not part of a regional organisation or are part of a regional organisation that has yet to develop their own set of CBMs?
– How can the OEWG support States engaging in transparency measures, as with the sharing of relevant information and lessons learned?
– How can the OEWG leverage initiatives led by non-state actors –civil society, the private sector, and the technical community – that could contribute to shared goals of transparency, information sharing and cooperation?

  • Kathryn Jones, Head of International Cyber Governance, United Kingdom
  • Gerardo Isaac Morales Tenorio, Coordinator for Multidimensional Security, Multilateral Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Mexico
  • Amb. Yutaka Arima, Ambassador for Cyber Policy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
  • Kaja Ciglic, Senior Director, Digital Diplomacy, Microsoft
  • Moderator: Samuele Dominioni, Researcher, UNIDIR

15:55-16:10: Coffee break
16:10-17:10: Panel 5 – Capacity building
Capacity-building is a reciprocal endeavour in which participants learn from each other and where all sides benefit from the general improvement of global ICT security. Among the different cooperation models that exist, the international development community has embraced triangular cooperation: a partnership arrangement among the countries of the Global South with the support of the North and/or international development organisations. After briefly reviewing past discussions on capacity building, this panel will further explore how different cooperation models can continue to be developed in the cyber context:
Guiding questions:
– How can the OEWG support South–South, South–North, triangular, and regionally focused cooperation in cyber capacity-building?
– Are there any existing examples of “South-South” or “triangular” cooperation towards cyber capacity-building?
– What is missing from the discussion on models for cooperation towards cyber capacity-building?

  • Sherif Hashem, Former GGE Expert, Egypt, and Professor of information Sciences and Technology, George Mason University
  • Vowpailin Chovichien, Counsellor, Peace, Security and Disarmament Division, Department of International Organizations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Thailand
  • Carolin Weisser Harris, Lead International Operations, Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre (GCSCC), Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford
  • Patryk Pawlak, Executive Officer, European Union Institute for Security Studies
  • Moderator: Moliehi Makumane, Researcher, UNIDIR

17:10-17:55: Closing discussion – Looking back to move forward

  • Amb. Andrey Krutskikh, Director, Department of International Information Security, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Russian Federation
  • Michelle Markoff, Acting Coordinator for Cyber Issues, US Department of State, United States of America
  • Moderator: Robin Geiss, Director, UNIDIR

17:55-18:00: Conference closing
*Please note, the list of speakers is preliminary and subject to change.